![close](http://www.rubbleforum.com/images/closeicon.png)
Our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 study materials can help you pass the exam faster and take the certificate you want. Then you will have one more chip to get a good job. Our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 study materials allow you to stand at a higher starting point, pass the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam one step faster than others, and take advantage of opportunities faster than others. You know, your time is very precious in this fast-paced society. If you only rely on one person's strength, it is difficult for you to gain an advantage. Our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 learning questions will be your most satisfied assistant.
The Palo Alto Networks world has become so competitive and challenging. To say updated and meet the challenges of the market you have to learn new in-demand skills and upgrade your knowledge. With the Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Certification Exam everyone can do this job nicely and quickly. The Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) certification exam offers a great opportunity to validate the skills and knowledge.
>> Cost Effective PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Dumps <<
However, preparing for the Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) exam is not an easy job until they have real Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) exam questions that are going to help them achieve this target. They have to find a trusted source such as PDFVCE to reach their goals. Get Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Certified, and then apply for jobs or get high-paying job opportunities.
NEW QUESTION # 44
Device-ID can be used in which three policies? (Choose three.)
Answer: A,B,D
Explanation:
Device-ID is a feature in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that identifies devices based on their unique attributes (e.g., MAC addresses, device type, operating system). Device-ID can be used in several policy types to provide granular control. Here's how it applies to each option:
* Option A: Security
* Device-ID can be used in Security policies to enforce rules based on the device type or identity.
For example, you can create policies that allow or block traffic for specific device types (e.g., IoT devices).
* This is correct.
* Option B: Decryption
* Device-ID cannot be used in decryption policies. Decryption policies are based on traffic types, certificates, and other SSL/TLS attributes, not device attributes.
* This is incorrect.
* Option C: Policy-based forwarding (PBF)
* Device-ID can be used in PBF policies to control the forwarding of traffic based on the identified device. For example, you can route traffic from certain device types through specific ISPs or VPN tunnels.
* This is correct.
* Option D: SD-WAN
* SD-WAN policies use metrics such as path quality (e.g., latency, jitter) and application information for traffic steering. Device-ID is not a criterion used in SD-WAN policies.
* This is incorrect.
* Option E: Quality of Service (QoS)
* Device-ID can be used in QoS policies to apply traffic shaping or bandwidth control for specific devices. For example, you can prioritize or limit bandwidth for traffic originating from IoT devices or specific endpoints.
* This is correct.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Device-ID
NEW QUESTION # 45
A systems engineer (SE) is working with a customer that is fully cloud-deployed for all applications. The customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs but describes the following challenges:
"Our apps are in AWS and Azure, with whom we have contracts and minimum-revenue guarantees. We would use the built-in firewall on the cloud service providers (CSPs), but the need for centralized policy management to reduce human error is more important." Which recommendations should the SE make?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The customer is seeking centralized policy management to reduce human error while maintaining compliance with their contractual obligations to AWS and Azure. Here's the evaluation of each option:
* Option A: Cloud NGFWs at both CSPs; provide the customer a license for a Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems
* Cloud NGFW is a fully managed Next-Generation Firewall service by Palo Alto Networks, offered in AWS and Azure marketplaces. It integrates natively with the CSP infrastructure, making it a good fit for customers with existing CSP agreements.
* Panorama, Palo Alto Networks' centralized management solution, can be deployed as a virtual appliance in the CSP marketplace of choice, enabling centralized policy management across all NGFWs.
* This option addresses the customer's need for centralized management while leveraging their existing contracts with AWS and Azure.
* This option is appropriate.
* Option B: Cloud NGFWs in AWS and VM-Series firewall in Azure; the customer selects a PAYG licensing Panorama deployment in their CSP of choice
* This option suggests using Cloud NGFW in AWS but VM-Series firewalls in Azure. While VM- Series is a flexible virtual firewall solution, it may not align with the customer's stated preference for CSP-managed services like Cloud NGFW.
* This option introduces a mix of solutions that could complicate centralized management and reduce operational efficiency.
* This option is less appropriate.
* Option C: VM-Series firewalls in both CSPs; manually built Panorama in the CSP of choice on a host of either type: Palo Alto Networks provides a license
* VM-Series firewalls are well-suited for cloud deployments but require more manual configuration compared to Cloud NGFW.
* Building a Panorama instance manually on a host increases operational overhead and does not leverage the customer's existing CSP marketplaces.
* This option is less aligned with the customer's needs.
* Option D: VM-Series firewall and CN-Series firewall in both CSPs; provide the customer a private-offer Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems
* This option introduces both VM-Series and CN-Series firewalls in both CSPs. While CN-Series firewalls are designed for Kubernetes environments, they may not be relevant if the customer does not specifically require container-level security.
* Adding CN-Series firewalls may introduce unnecessary complexity and costs.
* This option is not appropriate.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Cloud NGFW
* Panorama overview in Palo Alto Knowledge Base
* VM-Series firewalls deployment guide in CSPs: Palo Alto Documentation
NEW QUESTION # 46
Which use case is valid for Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs)?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs) provide robust security features across a variety of use cases. Let's analyze each option:
A: Code-embedded NGFWs provide enhanced IoT security by allowing PAN-OS code to be run on devices that do not support embedded VM images.
This statement is incorrect. NGFWs do not operate as "code-embedded" solutions for IoT devices. Instead, they protect IoT devices through advanced threat prevention, device identification, and segmentation capabilities.
B: Serverless NGFW code security provides public cloud security for code-only deployments that do not leverage VM instances or containerized services.
This is not a valid use case. Palo Alto NGFWs provide security for public cloud environments using VM- series firewalls, CN-series (containerized firewalls), and Prisma Cloud for securing serverless architectures.
NGFWs do not operate in "code-only" environments.
C: IT/OT segmentation firewalls allow operational technology (OT) resources in plant networks to securely interface with IT resources in the corporate network.
This is a valid use case. Palo Alto NGFWs are widely used in industrial environments to provide IT/OT segmentation, ensuring that operational technology systems in plants or manufacturing facilities can securely communicate with IT networks while protecting against cross-segment threats. Features like App-ID, User- ID, and Threat Prevention are leveraged for this segmentation.
D: PAN-OS GlobalProtect gateways allow companies to run malware and exploit prevention modules on their endpoints without installing endpoint agents.
This is incorrect. GlobalProtect gateways provide secure remote access to corporate networks and extend the NGFW's threat prevention capabilities to endpoints, but endpoint agents are required to enforce malware and exploit prevention modules.
Key Takeaways:
* IT/OT segmentation with NGFWs is a real and critical use case in industries like manufacturing and utilities.
* The other options describe features or scenarios that are not applicable or valid for NGFWs.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks NGFW Use Cases
* Industrial Security with NGFWs
NEW QUESTION # 47
Which statement appropriately describes performance tuning Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) functions on a Palo Alto Networks NGFW running Advanced Threat Prevention?
Answer: A
Explanation:
* Create a New Threat Profile (Answer B):
* Performance tuning inIntrusion Prevention System (IPS)involves ensuring that only the most relevant and necessary signatures are enabled for the specific environment.
* Palo Alto Networks allows you to createcustom threat profilesto selectively enable signatures that match the threats most likely to affect the environment. This reduces unnecessary resource usage and ensures optimal performance.
* By tailoring the signature set, organizations can focus on real threats without impacting overall throughput and latency.
* Why Not A:
* Leaving all signatures turned on is not a best practice because it may consume excessive resources, increasing processing time and degrading firewall performance, especially in high- throughput environments.
* Why Not C:
* While working with TAC for debugging may help identify specific performance bottlenecks, it is not a recommended approach for routine performance tuning. Instead, proactive configuration changes, such as creating tailored threat profiles, should be made.
* Why Not D:
* Disabling irrelevant threat signatures can improve performance, but this task is effectively accomplished bycreating a new threat profile. Manually disabling signatures one by one is not scalable or efficient.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* Threat Prevention Best Practices
* Custom Threat Profile Configuration
NEW QUESTION # 48
A large global company plans to acquire 500 NGFWs to replace its legacy firewalls and has a specific requirement for centralized logging and reporting capabilities.
What should a systems engineer recommend?
Answer: C
Explanation:
A large deployment of 500 firewalls requires a scalable, centralized logging and reporting infrastructure.
Here's the analysis of each option:
* Option A: Combine Panorama for firewall management with Palo Alto Networks' cloud-based Strata Logging Service to offer scalability for the company's logging and reporting infrastructure
* TheStrata Logging Service(or Cortex Data Lake) is a cloud-based solution that offers massive scalability for logging and reporting. Combined with Panorama, it allows for centralized log collection, analysis, and policy management without the need for extensive on-premises infrastructure.
* This approach is ideal for large-scale environments like the one described in the scenario, as it ensures cost-effectiveness and scalability.
* This is the correct recommendation.
* Option B: Use Panorama for firewall management and to transfer logs from the 500 firewalls directly to a third-party SIEM for centralized logging and reporting
* While third-party SIEM solutions can be integrated with Palo Alto Networks NGFWs, directly transferring logs from 500 firewalls to a SIEM can lead to bottlenecks and scalability issues.
Furthermore, relying on third-party solutions may not provide the same level of native integration as the Strata Logging Service.
* This is not the ideal recommendation.
* Option C: Highlight the efficiency of PAN-OS, which employs AI to automatically extract critical logs and generate daily executive reports, and confirm that the purchase of 500 NGFWs is sufficient
* While PAN-OS provides AI-driven insights and reporting, this option does not address the requirement for centralized logging and reporting. It also dismisses the need for additional infrastructure to handle logs from 500 firewalls.
* This is incorrect.
* Option D: Deploy a pair of M-1000 log collectors in the customer data center, and route logs from all 500 firewalls to the log collectors for centralized logging and reporting
* The M-1000 appliance is an on-premises log collector, but it has limitations in terms of scalability and storage capacity when compared to cloud-based options like the Strata Logging Service. Deploying only two M-1000 log collectors for 500 firewalls would result in potential performance and storage challenges.
* This is not the best recommendation.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Panorama
* Strata Logging Service (Cortex Data Lake) overview in Palo Alto Networks Docs
NEW QUESTION # 49
......
Perhaps you have no choice and live unhappily now because you cannot change your current situation. Our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam materials will remove your from the bad condition. Life needs to be colorful and meaningful. We must realize our own values and make progress. Do not worry. Our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Study Guide will help you regain confidence. we can claim that with our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 practice engine for 20 to 30 hours, you will be quite confident to pass the exam.
PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Free Study Material: https://www.pdfvce.com/Palo-Alto-Networks/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-exam-pdf-dumps.html
What's more, if you need any after service help on our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam dumps, our after service staffs will always here to offer the most thoughtful service for you, The PSE-Strata-Pro-24 torrent prep contains the real questions and simulation questions of various qualifying examinations, Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Professional PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certification exam is a hard nut to crack, Palo Alto Networks Cost Effective PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Dumps Diversified functions can help you get an all-around preparation for the test.
Updating the Index, Before Attila, Rome had several PSE-Strata-Pro-24 New Cram Materials narrow escapes from other hordes of barbarians, What's more, if you need any after service help on our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Dumps, our after service staffs will always here to offer the most thoughtful service for you.
The PSE-Strata-Pro-24 torrent prep contains the real questions and simulation questions of various qualifying examinations, Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Professional PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certification exam is a hard nut to crack!
Diversified functions can help you get an PSE-Strata-Pro-24 all-around preparation for the test, Because a lot of people hope to get the certification by the related exam, now many leaders of companies prefer to the candidates who have the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certification.
Tags: Cost Effective PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Dumps, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Free Study Material, Exam PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Objectives Pdf, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 New Cram Materials, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Reliable Study Notes